The climate bill offers a boost to Biden, the Democrats. Can this change their fortunes in the medium term?


The surprise announcement of a deal on climate, prescription drugs and the tax bill, which could give President Biden a much-needed legislative victory, is the latest in a series of summer developments that have set a questioning alongside assumptions about the outcome of November’s midterm elections. Are the Democrats onto something or are they wrong?

At the start of the year, the broad outlines of the November elections were clear. Republicans were on track to win and possibly win big, including regaining control of the House. Everything was tilted against the Democrats: inflation, Biden’s anemic approval ratings, and history (the president’s party, with rare exceptions, loses seats in the first half of a new presidency).

But events – both expected and unexpected – have since taken place, including the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe vs. Wade and several other mass shootings, most notably the murder of 19 school children and two teachers in Uvalde, Texas, which led to the passage of the first gun safety bill in a decade. Add to that the possibility of enacting a package that everyone said was on life support a few weeks ago after Sen. Joe Manchin III appeared to walk away from the negotiating table, citing concerns regarding inflation.

Suddenly this week, the West Virginia Democrat, who has been at the center of what rises or falls on the legislative front, and Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (DN.Y.) came together to agreeing on a package that, while smaller than Biden’s original build Back Better Bill, was far larger than anyone would have thought possible earlier this month.

Schumer and Manchin produced the biggest climate bill in history, which also includes provisions to lower the cost of prescription drugs, expand subsidies for the Affordable Care Act, establish a tax minimum on corporations and to close a loophole that some wealthy taxpayers use to reduce their taxes. rates. The bill calls for $433 billion in new spending, including $385 billion to address climate change. It would generate around $739 billion in new revenue over the next decade.

Their fellow Democrats may have been stunned, but Republicans were outraged after helping pass a bipartisan semiconductor bill.

Here’s what’s in the Schumer-Manchin package

Passing the climate bill would give Biden and the Democratic candidates something tangible to discuss this fall, and the bill’s title — the Cut Inflation Act — shows just how much Democrats need an antidote to the high cost of gasoline, food and many other commodities. Lawrence Summers, the former Treasury secretary whose warnings in 2021 that Biden’s spending initiatives risked triggering inflation were widely dismissed by the White House, weighed in on the Schumer-Manchin package. He says this will likely help reduce the rate of inflation (although he still worries about a possible recession).

The road to passage of the Schumer-Manchin bill is potentially tortuous, given that there are expected to be no Republican votes. The sometimes enigmatic Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-Arizona) has yet to be heard from, and until she is satisfied, Democrats cannot get the bill out of the Senate. Other developments could occur in the House. Another emerging wave of the coronavirus adds another wrinkle to the timeline.

If the bill makes it to Biden’s office, the question is whether the new measure will have enough traction with the public to help Democratic candidates come November. Neither the $2 trillion stimulus package nor the bipartisan $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill, which passed last year, had enough resistance to bolster Biden’s perception among Readership. The President’s approval rating is still net negative despite these accomplishments. What about this bill, other than taking place closer to November, will be different?

Yet, added to the High Court’s abortion ruling and public revulsion at the mass shootings, the events of the summer are seen as having the potential to energize the Democratic base and improve Biden’s standing. among those of his own party. If so, it could limit Democratic losses in the House (although Republicans are still favored to take control) and revive the party’s hopes of maintaining its tenuous grip on the Senate. But there are still many ifs in these assumptions.

Strategists working on campaigns this year are looking closely at how people say they would vote in congressional races, a question known in the polling world as the generic voting test. In recent weeks, Democrats have been narrowly ahead and in a stronger position than they were earlier in the year. But Republicans and Democrats interpret these numbers differently.

Republican pollster Ed Goeas and Democratic pollster Celinda Lake have partnered for three decades on a series called Battleground Poll, now housed at Georgetown University’s Institute of Politics and Public Service. The latest in that series was released Thursday and it showed Democrats leading that Congressional voting test by 48% to 46%. Some other recent polls showed Democrats with a bigger advantage, while a few showed Republicans leading. RealClearPolitics’ average on Friday gave the GOP a roughly one-percentage-point advantage.

In a call with reporters Thursday, the two pollsters offered different interpretations of their current numbers. Goeas began by noting that the generic ballot question has always been biased in favor of the Democrats, that is, Republicans have done well even when the generic ballot question has shown a Democratic advantage.

“If the generic ballot is within five points, that usually means we (Republicans) get seats,” he said. “But I think the big question for Republicans is not whether we win control of Congress – I think we’re headed in that direction from all I can see – but whether we win it by five seats. or do we win it by 25 seats?” This is where motivation and enthusiasm come into play.

Lake countered by saying that political conditions today are different from what they were, say, in 2010, and that may affect how people will vote. Traditional assumptions about politics may hold less weight as the Republican Party embraces former President Donald Trump’s denials of the 2020 election results, and the midterm elections could bring more believers to power in Trump’s lies. The combination of the reversal of deer, the assault weapons issue, and the House committee hearings investigating the January 6, 2021, Capitol Hill bombing helped balance levels of intensity and motivation among voters from both parties. “I think we have a good chance of avoiding the kind of sweeping losses that both parties faced in the first non-year election,” Lake said.

Goeas agreed that Republican and Democratic voters are currently closer to equality in their intensity. The question he posed was whether this is transitional or something that will continue until November. Do the summer issues remain potent when the votes are cast, or are people falling back on the issues that have been most prominent on voters’ minds all year – inflation and crime and now the threat of a recession with that?

That’s the biggest question as primary season draws to a close and more voters start paying attention to their choices for November. Right now, Democrats are seeing reason to think their House losses can be sustained to a point where Republicans would have a slim majority next January and that due to flaws in some of the GOP Senate nominees , maintaining control is possible.

But the fundamentals are what the fundamentals are. Biden is unpopular, the cost of living is high, a possible recession is on the horizon unless the Federal Reserve calibrates things deftly, and most people think the country is on the right track. Democrats may be modestly optimistic today, but in September and October they will measure how much of a drag Biden’s position is putting on all of their candidates and whether what seems useful now has had the staying power to affect those fundamentals.

Leave a Comment